“In the year of our Lord” unnecessary relic, says CFI Task Force chair February 4, 2009Posted by Center for Inquiry Office of Public Policy in Commentary.
Tags: Separation of church and state;presidentil proclamations; First Amendment
The Center for Inquiry is looking forward to how President Obama will strengthen the separation of church and state with his judicial appointments. In the realm of keeping government neutral in matters of religion, it is important that all branches of government convey a message to nonbelievers and minority religions that they are no less a part of the community than are the majority Christians in our nation.
Thus, while the practice of issuing presidential proclamations designating the year of the proclamation as the “in the year of Our Lord” is not as grave a threat to government neutrality in matters of religion as would be the restoration of official prayers in public schools or exempting religious books from sales tax but imposing those taxes on secular books, it is still a practice that should now be retired. The phrase “in the year of Our Lord” is the English translation of the Latin “anno domini.” This is an unambiguous reference to Jesus.
Government is supposed to be neutral as between believer and nonbeliever and as between one religion and another religion. This phrase shows a predisposition to belief over nonbelief and to Christianity over Buddhism, Hinduism, Islam, and Judaism, and all the other minority religions.
Again, this is not the most pressing issue on which the future of secular government versus theocracy balances. However it is an unnecessary relic of the Christian tradition that, ultimately, should not find expression in official government proclamations.
Chair, First Amendment Task Force, Center for Inquiry, Council for Secular Humanism.